London Liberal Democrats

info@libdems4london.org.uk

Campaigning for London in Parliament, in Europe and in the London Assembly

Family Courts must stay in Brent - Teather

12.39.31pm UTC (GMT +0000) Wed 1st Nov 2006

Sarah Teather MP outside Family Court in Brent (photography: Chris.Leaman)

Sarah Teather MP and Cllr Rev. David Clues meeting with representatives of Brent's Family Court

Local Liberal Democrat MP for Brent East, Sarah Teather, has today met with representatives of Brent's threatened Family Court. The Borough's family magistrates and district judge have strong concerns over the new proposals, and appealed to the local MP, Sarah Teather, to help keep the family courts in Brent.

The Courts Service have proposed that, in the future, family work from Brent should be dealt with at Barnet County Court, Uxbridge County Court, or at Wells Street in W1. The Courts Service has admitted that Barnet and Uxbridge are not accessible to all via public transport.

This would leave vulnerable and disadvantaged families forced to travel to centres outside Brent, at their own cost. Brent Council would also be subject to the additional cost of ensuring social workers and legal representatives can reach these more distant courthouses.

The facilities for the family service in Brent are widely recognised to be outstanding. Unusually, Brent also has a sitting district judge with a particular expertise in family issues. This allows judicial oversight of often complex cases. A dedicated domestic violence unit is also to open in Brent Magistrates Courts early next year, which with the family courts service also on site, would allow a coherent approach to family issues.

Liberal Democrat MP Sarah Teather is writing to the Lord Chancellor to object to these proposals.

Liberal Democrat MP for Brent East Sarah Teather said:

"I am extremely angry about this ill-thought through proposal to axe Brent's family courts. It is the young and the most vulnerable in this Borough who will suffer from these proposals.

"This is being driven by cost with no concerns about access to justice. But even on cost and efficiency grounds the proposals are naive. Given the excellent facilities in Brent and wide ranging expertise, how can it be more efficient to carve up a coherent system? As a local MP, I have seen many Government initiatives in three years that seem deaf to reason or compassion, but this is one of the most galling.

"I shall be explaining to the Lord Chancellor in no uncertain terms that Brent issues must be dealt with in Brent. The Court's Service has already admitted that it is difficult to get to alternative courts via public transport. They must recognise that these proposals are fundamentally flawed and scrap their plans to axe our Family Courts."

Bookmark this story at: del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg FacebookFacebook LibDigLibDig redditreddit StumbleUponStumbleUpon
Print this news story
Previous news story: Davey Gets Down with the Kids (Tue 31st Oct 2006).
Next news story: Teather backs inquiry into Iraq (Wed 1st Nov 2006).

Related News Stories:

Mon 3rd Nov 2008:

Thu 16th Oct 2008:

Wed 15th Oct 2008:

Sat 27th Sep 2008:

Tue 26th Aug 2008:

Mon 19th May 2008:

Tue 4th Dec 2007:

Thu 29th Nov 2007:

Wed 21st Nov 2007:

Tue 20th Nov 2007:

Mon 19th Nov 2007:

Sat 3rd Nov 2007:

Fri 26th Oct 2007:

Mon 22nd Oct 2007:

Mon 8th Oct 2007:

Wed 8th Aug 2007:

Mon 6th Nov 2006:

Tue 17th Oct 2006:

Tue 21st Feb 2006:

Mon 10th Oct 2005:

Wed 10th Aug 2005:

Tue 22nd Mar 2005:

Mon 21st Feb 2005:

Fri 3rd Dec 2004:

Printed and hosted by Prater Raines Ltd, 82b Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BX.
Published and promoted by London Liberal Democrats, 4 Cowley Street, London SW1P 3NB.
The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider.