![]() |
London Liberal Democrats Liberal Democrats for London |
![]() |
| London Liberal Democrats | <info@libdems4london.org.uk> |
QUEEN'S SPEECH FAILS TO DELIVER GREATER POWERS FOR ELECTED LONDON GOVERNMENT1.00.00pm UTC (GMT +0000) Tue 17th May 2005 Commenting on the omission in the Queen's Speech of any pledge to increase powers for the Greater London Authority while promising to provide greater powers to the Welsh Assembly, Leader of the London Assembly Liberal Democrats, Graham Tope, said:- "It appears that ministers still have strong reservations about handing Ken Livingstone further powers. It almost seems as if they don't want to give him extra rope in case he hangs the Labour Party in London. "It is deeply disappointing that Labour has failed to implement their manifesto pledge to review the powers of the Greater London Authority and the London Assembly. The Bill put forward in the Queen's Speech to give the Welsh Assembly greater power would have been an ideal opportunity for the government to give greater power to the elected London government." ENDS Notes to editor The Queen's Speech indicated that there would be legislation introduced to reform the National Assembly for Wales. The Government of Wales Bill would provide for enhanced legislative powers for the Assembly and make some changes to the body's electoral system . It would also change the 'corporate status' of the Assembly and ensure that the legislature and executive were legally separate entities. The Labour Party manifesto stated:- "We will also review the powers of the London Mayor and Greater London Authority. And we will devolve further responsibility to existing regional bodies in relation to planning, housing, economic development and transport."
Bookmark this story at:
Related News Stories:Wed 29th Nov 2006: Thu 29th Apr 2004: HUGHES AND KENNEDY LAUNCH MINIMUM POLICING GUARANTEE FOR GREATER LONDON Thu 22nd Apr 2004: Published and promoted by London Liberal Democrats, 4 Cowley Street, London SW1P 3NB. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |